Manchester City accuse Premier League of misleading treatment following the conclusion of a judgement in their APT lawsuit

on Monday night. City have written to the other 19 clubs objecting to the Premier League’s interpretation of the decision. And have unequivocally stood by their position that the APT rules are void and null and void.

The Premier League said they had prevailed in the decision because it found the APT rules were necessary. And that almost all of City’s objections were overturned.

“Sadly, the summary of the matter is misleading and contains a number of inaccuracies,” Simon Cliff, City’s legal counsel. Wrote in an email to the clubs.

“When the Premier League consulted on and proposed the original APT rules towards the end of 2021. We indicated that the process was expedited (taking only a few weeks), was imprudent and would have been anti-competitive. This recent judgment reinforces those concerns. “

The court has now declared the APT rules to be unlawful. City’s position is that the APT rules are void and have been in place since 2021.”

City said in their letter that it was bizarre that the Premier League would state in its conclusion that their objections The Citizens were unsuccessful on almost every count.

“While it is true that City were unsuccessful on all of their objections, clubs do not need to prove that the APT rule was unlawful on a number of different grounds. “

It is sufficient that a single finding of unlawfulness is found. In this case the court found that the APT rule was unlawful on http://ufabet999.app three different grounds.”

The Premier League has scheduled a meeting of its clubs next week to discuss the change, but Cliff says this is not the time to rush into a decision that could lead to another court appearance, but rather to seek a thorough review of how to proceed.